Following nearly annihilating our planet, the families have become allies’: the gripping podcast featuring JFK and Nikita Khrushchev’s relatives.

In the month of October 1962, humanity edged nearer to destruction than at any other point during modern times. This happened after an American surveillance aircraft discovered the fact that Russian atomic missile installations were under construction in the island of Cuba, a mere 160 kilometers off the coast of American soil. Reacting to this, President John F Kennedy ordered a naval task force to impose a naval quarantine encircling Cuba. The ensuing period constituted nearly two weeks of extreme stress.

An Catastrophic Danger

The threat was clear. If President Kennedy, or else the Soviet counterpart, Premier Khrushchev, were to fire against the other side, a chain reaction involving worldwide atomic strikes followed by counterstrikes would have ensued, plunging mankind toward total destruction.

The Cuban missile crisis has been covered repeatedly, through volumes, movies, and television programmes. However, for its third season, a prominent audio documentary series titled "The Bomb" has brought an unprecedented element to the story. The series is jointly hosted featuring Kennedy's relative alongside Nina Khrushcheva, family members belonging to the leaders that, over two tense weeks, held the destiny of the world in their hands.

"What were the Kremlin thinking? What was the United States planning?" ponders Khrushcheva, Khrushchev’s great-granddaughter and an academic specializing in global relations.

For her, the strength of the show lies in its attempt to question: "How can people detest one another to the point they confront each other?"

"It struck me how remarkable it is that individuals have the potential to be friends or else have the potential to be total enemies," states Kennedy, the son of RFK, related to JFK and now an author as well as lawyer. "History shows this over and over when nations have gone to war, demonstrating the profound irrationality it is to fight."

The Precipice Towards Disaster

What’s remarkable regarding this event was that, since it transpired so publicly, people globally could watch almost as it happened while it crept towards disaster. However, the threat of annihilation came closer than anybody realised.

"The overwhelming majority among Kennedy's advisors were advocating for a military strike followed by a ground invasion," notes Kennedy. "If we had struck Cuba with the naval blockade, undoubtedly the Russians stationed there would've fired a tactical nuclear weapon at the US Sixth Fleet, which would've sunk our aircraft carriers and sunk America's largest and most important fleet. And, we would have retaliated through an overwhelming counterattack that would have eradicated all life on the planet."

The reality it didn’t highlights the composure of both leaders, they managed to remain calm while engaging in diplomacy at a time when many advisors in their governments were advocating action. Consequently, Khrushchev removed the missiles from the Caribbean island and Kennedy (although not reported at the time) removed American missiles from Turkey. The sense of relief was worldwide, as was the sense of hope.

The Different Perspective

Still, for those two weeks in October, the anxiety was palpable by everyone. The podcast's co-hosts were born in the years following these events, and Khrushcheva being taught about it via the Soviet education system, which painted an alternative version of what happened.

"As you mentioned your parent remembers it, and it was a frightening time," she says. "However in the Soviet Union, the public really didn’t know that much about it, because it was a crisis, whereas in the Soviet Union the official line was that things are always fine or positive."

Inside Khrushchev’s family, however, the perspective was different. "They told me what a great occasion it was, because it was a direct confrontation. The leaders managed to find a solution, and didn’t start the war, seen as a positive outcome," she continues. Subsequently, however, that view would not be held by everybody. "For a long time within Russian historical analysis, it was considered a setback for Khrushchev, simply he refrained from destroying America."

An Unlikely Collaboration

This podcast is so even-handed , well produced so much so that Khrushcheva quips she nearly forgot she already knew outcome. This is, partly, thanks to the participation of renowned scholars. Yet, truly, the most groundbreaking aspect remains the involvement of the descendants. Even within living memory, it was inconceivable for descendants of the leaders of the United States and the USSR would appear side by side. That Max Kennedy and Nina Khrushcheva are able to do so, and exhibit such warmth with each other, must be seen as a symbol of progress.

"Max and I are not the first," notes Nina. "After 1991, a relative moved to America where he became great friends with Dwight Eisenhower’s children."

"However we were strangers prior to this project," clarifies Max. "That is unfortunate because we got along immediately and we are friends, which is really great. Finally, following almost six decades since almost destroying the world, our families have become friends, so I think the world is more secure, a little bit."

Contemporary Parallels and Current Perils

Or is it? One reason why The Bomb seems so urgent is because we now find ourselves living through dark times. The symbolic clock of doom is closer to catastrophe in its history, in part because world leaders appear not to be able to grasp

Erika Ayala
Erika Ayala

A seasoned collector and writer specializing in vintage and modern trading cards, with over a decade of experience in the hobby.